icon-angleicon-facebookicon-hatebuicon-instagramicon-lineicon-linked_inicon-pinteresticon-twittericon-youtubelogo-not
SCROLL
TOP
Publications 著书和论文
简报

Digitalization of Civil Litigation Procedures in Japan

NO&T Japan Legal Update

著者等
田岛弘基
出版社
长岛・大野・常松律师事务所
书籍名或刊登
杂志
NO&T Japan Legal Update No.49 (2025年6月)
语言

英文

相关信息
业务领域
请注意,本简报的目的是提供信息,并非提供法律建议。另外,本简报仅包括根据发行日(制作日)时点的信息,不包括该时点之后的信息。特别是速报可能会与现状的解释或惯例不同,敬请留意。

I. Introduction

The digitalization of civil litigation procedures in Japan began with the introduction of teleconferencing and video conferencing systems under the 2010 amendment of the Code of Civil Procedure. The use of teleconference had become widely adopted, enabling parties or their representatives located far from the courts to participate in preparatory proceedings to arrange issues and evidence. However, many aspects of civil litigation in Japan have yet to be modernized. For instance:

  • as a general requirement, paper documents must be lodged in order to file a lawsuit;
  • parties and their representatives are required to physically attend dates for oral arguments; and
  • court records are kept in paper form and people who wish to inspect the records are required to visit the courthouse.

These days, where information and communication technology has advanced significantly, the digitalization of civil litigation is being promoted to make civil litigation more efficient and accessible to parties. This article provides an overview of the recent changes relating to the digitalization of civil litigation in Japan that are being introduced through the enactment of further amendments to the Code of Civil Procedure.※1

II. Conducting oral arguments and witness examinations using web conferencing

Previously, teleconferencing systems were commonly used in preparatory proceedings to arrange issues and evidence, but was limited to parties who were domiciled or resided far from the courts. It was also limited by requiring at least one party to appear in court. Under the amended Code of Civil Procedure and changes which came into effect from March 1, 2021, both parties may now attend preparatory proceedings via web or teleconference without appearing in court, regardless of their distance. In addition, since 2020, Japanese courts have introduced Microsoft Teams to hold preparatory proceedings for arranging issues and evidence, with many courts actively using the platform to hold such proceedings.

Furthermore, under the amended Code of Civil Procedure and changes which came into effect from March 1, 2022, if the court finds it to be appropriate, after hearing the opinion of the parties, the court may conduct the proceedings on the date for oral arguments via web conference. Notwithstanding this, the Constitution of Japan still provides that trials shall be conducted and judgments declared publicly. Therefore, even if the parties use web conferencing on those dates for oral arguments, the judge must be present in the courtroom, and observers be given the opportunity to attend oral argument dates by viewing the web conference from the courtroom.

Additionally, while witness examinations are generally required to be conducted in person in court, after the implementation of the amended Code of Civil Procedure by next year, the court may examine witnesses via web conference if the court finds it to be appropriate and neither party objects to the use of web conferencing.

III. Filing of complaints and service of documents online

To file a complaint, it is currently necessary to prepare a written complaint and evidence on paper and submit the documents to the court in person or by mail. Filing fees also have to be paid by purchasing revenue stamps and affixing them to the complaint. After the implementation of the amended Code of Civil Procedure by next year, it will be possible to file complaints and pay the relevant filing fees online. For attorneys filing lawsuits on behalf of a plaintiff, the use of online filings will be mandatory, however, a plaintiff may still personally file in paper form even after the amendment is introduced, to ensure everyone has proper access to judicial services.

Under the new amendments, the service of documents (including complaints filed online) will continue to be undertaken in the same manner as complaints that are filed in paper form, by physically serving copies of the documents on the recipient. However, if the recipient to be served has submitted a notification consenting to online service in advance, service may be made online. In that case, service takes effect when the person views or downloads the documents, or one week after notification that documents have been electronically delivered.

IV. Digitalization of court records and inspection of electronic records

Previously, court records stored at the courthouse consisted of paper documents submitted by the parties in person, by mail, or by fax. Therefore, to inspect court records, one had to visit the courthouse and request to inspect the original paper court records. After the amended Code of Civil Procedure comes into effect by next year, court records will be digitally stored on a server maintained by the court. Parties to a case and interested third parties may inspect the court records electronically on their own computers, while other third parties may inspect the electronic records on computers maintained by the court.

V. Conclusion

The implementation of the amended Code of Civil Procedure will significantly digitalize Japan’s civil litigation system, enhancing efficiency of civil litigation procedures. However, many aspects of its implementation remain uncertain at this stage, and it is necessary to closely monitor the developments.

Endnotes

*1
The amended Code of Civil Procedure has already been promulgated and will come into effect from the date specified by a Cabinet Order, which must occur by May 24, 2026. Certain of these changes have already come into effect, as noted in this article.

This newsletter is given as general information for reference purposes only and therefore does not constitute our firm’s legal advice. Any opinion stated in this newsletter is a personal view of the author(s) and not our firm’s official view. For any specific matter or legal issue, please do not rely on this newsletter but make sure to consult a legal adviser. We would be delighted to answer your questions, if any.

全文下载(PDF)

律师等

争议解决相关著书/论文

民商事诉讼相关著书/论文

确定 选择业务领域
确定