NO&T Japan Legal Update
This article is also available in Japanese.
Following establishment of the FIT system in Japan, the introduction of renewable power generation facilities (mainly solar power generation) has been promoted and many new companies have entered the market. While this trend has desirable aspects in terms of achieving the decarbonization goals of Japan, power generation facilities have a significant impact on the local community and environment where they are installed. This has led to growing concerns in local communities regarding the safety※1, disaster prevention, impact on the landscape and environment, and future disposal of such facilities. To promote the introduction of renewable power generation facilities in a sustainable manner, “Regional Symbiosis” (chi’iki kyōsei) has become a key phrase for renewable energy projects.
In order to realize Regional Symbiosis, the Working Group on Long-Term Renewable Energy Sources and Regional Symbiosis (the “WG”), a working group within the Agency for Natural Resources and Energy, has been examining the situation, discussing the appropriate measures and produced an interim report※2 in February 2023 (the “Interim Report”). Based on this Interim Report, the GX Carbon-Free Power Supply Act, which included amendments to the Act on Special Measures concerning Promotion of Utilization of Renewable Energy Sources (the “Renewable Energy Special Measures Act”), was submitted to the 211th Diet and was passed in May 2023. The amended Renewable Energy Special Measures Act (the “Amended Renewable Energy Special Measures Act”) is scheduled to come into force on April 1, 2024.
Since the passage of the GX Carbon-Free Power Supply Act, the WG has been carefully discussing its details. In November 2023, a Second Report※3 (the “Second Report”) was published.※4
Although there are some remaining issues, the details of the amendments to the Renewable Energy Special Measures Act have become clear. This newsletter outlines the main contents of the Amended Renewable Energy Special Measures Act as well as the thinking of the WG. It also explains some points that should be noted in practice.
Particular attention should be paid to the following parts of the Amended Renewable Energy Special Measures Act: “III. Addition of briefing sessions for local residents in surrounding areas to the FIT/FIP approval requirements”; “IV. Obligation of approved operators to supervise subcontractors”; and “V. Order to reserve and return amount equivalent to subsidy for FIT/FIP projects”. These will all have a significant impact on the implementation and operation of existing FIT/FIP projects and secondary projects.
The following permits (1) to (3) regarding land development became requirements for applying for FIT/FIP approval because they are particularly relevant to the safety of the surrounding areas which can be extremely difficult to restore to their original state once the activity subject to the permit has been completed:※5
When establishing renewable power generation facilities, there have been instances where trouble has arisen due to a lack of communication between the project operator and local residents, which has sometimes led to serious problems such as opposition movements, reporting to authorities, and lawsuits.
For this reason, the Amended Renewable Energy Special Measures Act stipulates that prior announcement of information to the surrounding community, including briefing sessions for local residents, is a requirement for FIT/FIP approval (Article 9, Paragraph 2, Item 7 and Paragraph 4, Item 6 of the Amended Renewable Energy Special Measures Act). In addition, detailed arrangements for such matters are specified in the Second Report.
In the past, it was not uncommon for briefings for local residents to be held in accordance with local government regulations and other laws and regulations or on a voluntary basis when developing renewable energy projects. However, the Amended Renewable Energy Special Measures Act now stipulates quite detailed requirements for such briefing sessions, including the procedures for holding such briefing sessions and the content to be covered, and it will be necessary to pay attention to “whether these requirements are satisfied” at future briefings for FIT/FIP projects.
In the Second Report, the following general rules have been adopted in relation to power sources for which briefings should be held, taking into account differences in their scale, location, and type of installation.
(Source: Reference Material 1 of the 11th meeting of the WG※8)
(Source: Reference Material 1 of the 11th meeting of the WG※8)
The following table provides an overview of the items to be explained at briefing sessions.
(Source: Reference Material 1 (with partial amendment) of the 11th meeting of the WG)
(Source: Reference Material 1 (with partial amendment) of the 11th meeting of the WG)
The scope of “local residents in the surrounding area” for briefing sessions is defined as the residents within a “certain distance” of the project site※9 boundary as well as owners of land or buildings located adjacent to the installation site of the renewable power generation facilities.
In addition, for renewable power generation projects that are required to hold briefing sessions, prior consultation with municipal councils that understand the actual conditions of the area is required, and if a municipal council provides an opinion regarding the scope of “local residents in the surrounding area”, the scope of “local residents in the surrounding area“ is required to be expanded, respecting the opinion of the local governments.
The above “certain distance” is, according to Second Report, defined as the following:
As a general rule, briefing sessions need to be held at least a certain period of time (3 months) prior to the application for FIT/FIP approval. However, in cases where there is a significant impact on local residents in the surrounding area, such as for cases where obtaining a permit under the law is required as a condition to applying for FIT/FIP approval, multiple briefing sessions are required to be held from the initial stage of the project.
In the Second Report, it was clarified that, in the case of business transfers※10 or change of substantive controller of the project※11, there are instances where problems arise due to a lack of communication between project operators and local residents, and therefore, it is required to hold a briefing session after the contract for business transfer is signed (or after the announcement if the business transfer is announced to the public) and before applying for FIT/FIP change approval.※12
At the briefing session, the transferor and transferee are required to explain the transfer, including the matters to be taken over between the transferor and transferee. In addition, in the case of a business transfer, both the transferor and the transferee are required to attend the briefing session.※13
Until these amendments, it was not necessarily common practice for secondary projects to hold briefing sessions for a wide range of residents, other than the contract counterparties of the project operator, such as landowners, etc. Therefore, these amendments are expected to have a significant practical impact. In light of the requirement to hold briefing sessions that satisfy detailed requirements to obtain FIT/FIP change approval, it will be necessary to consider specific actions and the terms of transactions for each individual secondary project, including the schedule and closing/post-closing conditions, and to make provision for them in the assignment agreement(s).
In addition to the above, the Second Report contains detailed requirements for matters such as the agenda of briefing sessions, responses to inquiries before and after the session, methods for announcing the session, attendees, and records and reports.
Although there are many instances of contracting or subcontracting work in renewable power generation projects, the Renewable Energy Special Measures Act does not clearly define the liability of approved operators in the event that a contractor or subcontractor violates the FIT/FIP approved business plan. Therefore, the Amended Renewable Energy Special Measures Act requires approved operators to supervise contractors and subcontractors to ensure that they comply with the FIT/FIP approved business plan (Article 10-3, Paragraph 2 of the Amended Renewable Energy Special Measures Act).
If the approved operator fails to perform its supervisory obligations, it will be subject to an improvement order (kaizen meirei) (Article 13 of the same Act) which, if not complied with, will eventually be a cause for revocation of FIT/FIP approval (Article 15, Item 1 of the same Act).
The Second Report lists contracts for services related to procedural agency/project management, design, land development, construction/installation work, maintenance/inspection, decommissioning, and disposal/recycling as examples of the types of service contracts that are subject to the supervisory obligation. However, since the Amended Renewable Energy Special Measures Act stipulates that the obligation applies to the contracting of “all or part of the operations related to renewable power generation projects,” a broad range of contractors are considered to be subject to the supervisory obligation.
According to the Second Report, in order to externally verify the undertaking of supervisory obligations, it is required that a written agreement be executed between the approved operator and the contractor, and that the agreement clearly state that the contractor must comply with the FIT/FIP approval requirements and approved business plan, including compliance with related laws and regulations. In order to effectively ensure this occurs, the agreement must also include items such as a reporting system from the contractor to the approved operator and requiring prior consent from the approved operator when the contractor subcontracts any related work to a third party.※14
While it is considered standard to execute a written agreement between an approved operator and a contractor even in current practice, it should be noted that when these amendments come into effect, the necessary items described above will be required to be stipulated in the relevant agreement.
According to the Second Report, in order to confirm whether the supervisory obligations are being properly performed, approved operators are required to submit periodic reports to the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry that contain the following contents.
Under the Renewable Energy Special Measures Act, approved operators are required to operate their power generation projects in accordance with their FIT/FIP approved business plans (including compliance with related laws and regulations). In the case of violation, measures such as the issuance of guidance (shidō) (Article 12 of the Renewable Energy Special Measures Act), an improvement order (kaizen meirei) (Article 13 of the same Act), or revocation of the FIT/FIP approval (Article 15, Item 1 of the same Act) will be taken.
Under the current (i.e., pre-amendment) rules, the approved operator can continue to earn income from electricity sales under the FIT/FIP project until the violation results in revocation of FIT/FIP approval, and a certain period of time is required for revocation of FIT/FIP approval through a hearing procedure under the Administrative Procedure Act. This is a concern for the prevention and early resolution of violations. For this reason, the Amended Renewable Energy Special Measures Act has established a new rule of “Subsidy Reserve Order” so that if an approved operator violates the FIT/FIP approved business plan, the amount equivalent to the subsidy for FIT/FIP projects can be promptly withheld by the Organization for Cross-regional Coordination of Transmission Operators, JAPAN (“OCCTO”).
Since a Subsidy Reserve Order is, in effect, an order to pay the equivalent to the amount of the FIT/FIP subsidy and is therefore a monetary disposition, it has been treated as not requiring an opportunity for a hearing procedure or explanation procedure in accordance with Article 13, Paragraph 2, Item 4 of the Administrative Procedure Act. As for the specific timing of the issuance of Subsidy Reserve Orders, the Second Report states that this will be “at least at the stage when the violations that are subject to administrative dispositions or penalties under the relevant laws and regulations are recognized and objective measures (written guidance, etc.) are taken with regard to the violations”. As shown in the figure below, it should be noted that the Subsidy Reserve Order will be issued much earlier than an improvement order (kaizen meirei) or revocation of FIT/FIP approval.
(Source: Figure 1 of the Interim Report)
(Source: Figure 1 of the Interim Report)
Although the specific calculation method of the reserve amount is left to the ministerial ordinance (Article 15-7 of the Amended Renewable Energy Special Measures Act), according to the Interim Report, it is expected that the amount of the “purchase price in FIT scheme minus avoided cost (amount equivalent to revenue in the electricity trading market)” for FIT projects will be approximately equivalent to the reserve amount.※15 In the case of FIP projects, it is expected to be the same amount as the FIP subsidy. In other words, for both FIT and FIP projects, the amount of financial support under the FIT/FIP system is the amount subject to being the reserve amount.
The specific scheme for reservation of the amount equivalent to the subsidy based on the Subsidy Reserve Order is shown in the figure below. In FIT projects, when a Subsidy Reserve Order is issued, the approved operator is supposed to pay reserve funds to OCCTO via the party obliged to purchase the electricity (transmission service operators, etc.), and these reserve funds are supposed to be reserved by offsetting the reserve obligation and the FIT electricity charge.
(Source: Figures 2 and 3 of the Interim Report)
(Source: Figures 2 and 3 of the Interim Report)
As an incentive for early resolution of violations, approved operators may request to reclaim an amount equivalent to the reserved subsidy in any of the following cases:
On the other hand, if the violation is not resolved and the FIT/FIP approval is revoked, the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry may issue an order for refund or payment of the amount equivalent to the subsidy (“Return Order”) (Article 15-11 of the Amended Renewable Energy Special Measures Act). According to the Second Report, in this case, the money related to the Return Order can be effectively recovered by offsetting (i) the right to claim for return or payment from OCCTO to the approved operator arising from the Return Order, and (ii) the right to reclaim of the reserve fund equivalent to the subsidy from the approved operator to OCCTO.
According to the Interim Report, the amount subject to the Return Order is to be taken from a portion of the financial support amount provided under the FIT/FIP scheme, after considering the extent that the approved operator contributed to the violation and other factors.※16
Under the Renewable Energy Special Measures Act, approved operators are required to notify the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry of any change of address without delay, but there have been some approved operators who do not properly file such notifications. If the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry is unable to identify the address of an approved operator, there will be concerns regarding the prompt issuance of administrative dispositions such as an improvement order (kaizen meirei) or revocation of FIT/FIP approval for such approved operator.
In consideration of these concerns, the Amended Renewable Energy Special Measures Act clarifies that improvement orders (Article 13 of the same Act), revocation of FIT/FIP approval (Article 15 of the same Act), and orders to reserve funds equivalent to the subsidy (Article 15-6 of the same Act) shall be issued by delivering documents (Articles 52-2 and 52-3 of the same Act). Also, if the address of the recipient is unclear, delivery by public notice (a method in which delivery is deemed to have been made by posting a notice on the bulletin board of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry) is allowed (Article 52-4 of the same Act). It should be noted that, together with the above-mentioned establishment of a new rule for ordering the reserve and return of the amount equivalent to the FIT/FIP subsidy, procedures have been established to promptly take action against approved operators that are in violation of the relevant laws.※17
*1
There have been accidents such as the scattering and collapse of solar panels and frames.
*4
Based on the Second Report, a public comment solicitation period for the Ordinance for Enforcement of the Renewable Energy Special Measures Act has started (the public comment period ends on December 27, 2023).
*5
This strengthening of the FIT/FIP approval procedures was implemented by amending the Ordinance for Enforcement of the Renewable Energy Special Measures Act, and came into effect on October 1, 2023, without waiting for the Amended Renewable Energy Special Measures Act to come into effect. However, transitional provisions are provided for the following cases:
*6
According to the Second Report, if there are multiple renewable energy generation projects operated by the same approved operator within the prescribed distance of the residents in the surrounding area, the total output of these multiple power sources will be used to determine whether or not a briefing session is required.
*7
According to the Second Report, the areas are: (1) those subject to the three laws for erosion control which are the Erosion Control Act, Landslide Prevention Act, and the Act on Prevention of Disasters Caused by Steep Slope Failure; (2) those with high risk of damage to renewable power generation facilities in the event of a disaster (landslide disaster warning areas (including special landslide disaster warning areas) and landslide disaster risk areas); and (3) protected areas if such areas are designated by local government regulations for the purpose of protecting the natural environment and landscape.
*9
According to the Second Report, in general, this refers to the installation site of power generation facilities under the Renewable Energy Special Measures Act and includes not only power generation facilities but also electrical facilities such as circuit breakers, and water intake facilities, water pressure pipelines, and other facilities.
*10
According to the Second Report, a company split also should be treated in the same way as a business transfer in terms of the briefing sessions.
*11
The specific details of what will constitute a substantive controller and what will constitute a change of the substantive controller of the project owner are expected to be discussed by the WG in the future.
*12
In addition to when there is a business transfer or change of substantive controller of the project owner, briefing sessions are also required when there are changes in important matters in the FIT/FIP approved business plan, such as certain output changes of renewable power generation facilities or changes in the location of the installation site.
*13
In the case of a change of the substantive controller of the project owner, the approved operator itself must attend the briefing session, as is the case for briefing sessions when newly seeking an FIT/FIP approval.
*14
In the future, guidelines or other directions are expected to be published providing the appropriate reporting format for a typical case of contracting and examples of the evidence to be used when reporting using objective materials (e.g., photos of the site of the project site, etc.).
*15
In addition, the Interim Report states that the amount equivalent to consumption tax, business tax, and supply-demand adjustment expenses shall be deducted from the reserved amount.
*16
Regarding the amount of money subject to the Return Order, the Interim Report states, “In principle, the reserve amount should be required to be returned in the case of revocation of FIT/FIP approval. However, cases leading to the revocation of FIT/FIP approval vary in terms of the level of violation, the degree of deviation from the approved business plan, and the degree of attributable responsibility of the approved operator. The cases may include those that violate the approved business plan but the degree of attributable responsibility of the approved operator is low, and flexible measures should be taken according to the case”.
*17
Under the current rules, it is possible to issue an administrative disposition by delivery of public notice in accordance with the Civil Code and the Code of Civil Procedure, but it is required to post the notice on the court bulletin board, or publish it in the official gazette, etc.
This newsletter is given as general information for reference purposes only and therefore does not constitute our firm’s legal advice. Any opinion stated in this newsletter is a personal view of the author(s) and not our firm’s official view. For any specific matter or legal issue, please do not rely on this newsletter but make sure to consult a legal adviser. We would be delighted to answer your questions, if any.
Dzung Pay
(August 2024)
Rintaro Hirano, Yutaro Fujimoto, Misaki Aono, Naoto Obara (Co-author)
Yoshihisa Watanabe
Jiro Mikami, Eiji Miyagi, Yoshihisa Watanabe, Saori Kawai (Co-author)
(August 2024)
Rintaro Hirano, Yutaro Fujimoto, Misaki Aono, Naoto Obara (Co-author)
Jiro Mikami, Eiji Miyagi, Yoshihisa Watanabe, Saori Kawai (Co-author)
(March 2024)
Kiyoshi Honda, Saori Kawai (Co-author)
Yutaro Fujimoto (Co-author)
Yoshihisa Watanabe
Jiro Mikami, Eiji Miyagi, Yoshihisa Watanabe, Saori Kawai (Co-author)
(December 2023)
Hiromi Hattori, Yuichi Miyashita (Co-author)
Kaoru Hattori, Ryosaku Kondo (Co-author)