NO&T Dispute Resolution Update
NO&T Asia Legal Review
1. In August 2023, the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (“SIAC”) released a revised draft 7th edition of the SIAC Rules (the “Draft Rules”) for public consultation.
2. The Draft Rules are primarily aimed at improving the expediency and cost-effectiveness of arbitrations. Key changes include:
3. A comparative table below summarises the differences in requirements and features amongst (i) the new Streamlined Procedure, (ii) the current Expedited Procedure, and (iii) the revised Expedited Procedure:
New Streamlined Procedure | Current Expedited Procedure | Revised Expedited Procedure | |
---|---|---|---|
Prerequisites |
|
|
|
Number of Arbitrators |
|
|
|
Hearing |
|
|
|
Expected Timeline |
|
|
|
Expected Costs |
|
|
4. These new amendments are a welcome change for appropriate types of disputes, as parties can enjoy quick and cost-effective arbitrations while keeping proceedings private and confidential, a core benefit of arbitration. In particular, the Streamlined and Expedited proceedings would be suitable for low-value claims (i.e., below S$1 and S$10 million respectively) or claims which are of higher value but are relatively straightforward and/or involve limited or no factual disputes.
5. The existing emergency arbitration procedure has also been updated to enable parties to enhance parties’ access to and speed of the mechanism.
6. Under the new Draft Rules, an application for an emergency arbitration can be made before the claimant commences the main arbitration (currently the emergency arbitration application must be made at least concurrently with the commencement of the main arbitration), and the emergency award must be issued within 10 days (instead of the current 14 days) of the emergency arbitrator’s appointment.
7. As emergency relief is typically sought by a claimant on an urgent basis to compel the respondent (i) to refrain from carrying out an act or (ii) to carry out an act in order to avoid suffering loss that cannot be adequately compensated by monetary means (e.g. where the respondent’s acts result in irreparable harm to the claimant’s reputation), these proposed changes to the process will boost the effectiveness of the emergency arbitration mechanism.
8. A preliminary determination is a partial award made by the tribunal upon application by the parties to resolve, at a preliminary stage, certain key issues which affect other issues in the arbitration. The aim of such determinations is usually to streamline the rest of the arbitration by reducing the disputed issues and scope of the arbitration early on which will help parties save time and cost. A preliminary determination on such key issues may also be helpful for settlement considerations as there is now more clarity on where the merits lie and that may be an impetus for eventual settlement before the arbitration runs its full course.
9. While applications for preliminary determinations are customarily available to parties, the Draft Rules expressly codify the procedure, considerations and timeline for such an application. This lends greater clarity to the process, and should encourage parties to consider applying for a preliminary determination in appropriate cases – for example, where there is a key legal issue that materially affects the case, or where issues of liability and quantum can be bifurcated.
10. These proposed amendments to enhance the expediency, cost-effectiveness and user experience of SIAC arbitrations are a welcome update to the SIAC rules which were last revised in 2016, and ensure that SIAC arbitrations remain relevant and attractive to international disputing parties.
11. As the consultation period on the Draft Rules has just come to an end in November, the Draft Rules (with minimal amendments, if any, based on the public consultation) are expected to come into effect in the first half of 2024.
This newsletter is given as general information for reference purposes only and therefore does not constitute our firm’s legal advice. Any opinion stated in this newsletter is a personal view of the author(s) and not our firm’s official view. For any specific matter or legal issue, please do not rely on this newsletter but make sure to consult a legal adviser. We would be delighted to answer your questions, if any.
Kenji Tosaki, Takahito Hirayama (Co-author)
(June 2025)
Oki Mori, Kiyoshi Sudo, Atsushi Ikuta (Co-author)
(May 2025)
Koichiro Yoshimura
(May 2025)
Shigeki Minami
(February 2025)
Koki Yanagisawa, Hiroyuki Ebisawa (Co-author)
Kara Quek, Kennosuke Muro (Co-author)
Annia Hsu, Kennosuke Muro (Co-author)
(October 2024)
Junichi Ikeda, Tomohiko Nabeshima, Akiko Inoue (Co-author)
(April 2025)
Kaori Sugimoto, Shota Toda, Kennosuke Muro (Co-author)
Kara Quek, Kennosuke Muro (Co-author)
(March 2025)
Junichi Ikeda, Shota Toda (Co-author)
Annia Hsu, Kennosuke Muro (Co-author)
Yuan Yao Lee
Chattong Sunthorn-opas, Thunsinee Sungmongkol (Co-author)
Yothin Intaraprasong, Yosuke Konno, Naruenad Charoenpakdee (Co-author)
Ario Putra Pamungkas
Yuan Yao Lee
Chattong Sunthorn-opas, Thunsinee Sungmongkol (Co-author)
Yothin Intaraprasong, Yosuke Konno, Naruenad Charoenpakdee (Co-author)
Ario Putra Pamungkas
Kara Quek, Kennosuke Muro (Co-author)
Annia Hsu, Kennosuke Muro (Co-author)
Claire Chong, Kennosuke Muro (Co-author)
Bertrice Hsu, Yuji Ibaraki (Co-author)