icon-angleicon-facebookicon-hatebuicon-instagramicon-lineicon-linked_inicon-pinteresticon-twittericon-youtubelogo-not
SCROLL
TOP
Publications
Newsletters

Draft Revised Guidelines on Beneficial Ownership Disclosure (Philippines)

NO&T Asia Legal Review

Author
Patricia O. Ko
Publisher
Nagashima Ohno & Tsunematsu
Journal /
Book
NO&T Asia Legal Review No.107 (October, 2025)
Reference
Practice Areas
*Please note that this newsletter is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. In addition, it is based on information as of its date of publication and does not reflect information after such date. In particular, please also note that preliminary reports in this newsletter may differ from current interpretations and practice depending on the nature of the report.

Introduction

On 10 October 2025, the Philippine Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) published the draft Memorandum Circular on the Revised Guidelines of the Beneficial Ownership Disclosure and Transparency Rules (“Draft Guidelines”) for public comments.

If adopted, the Draft Guidelines, formally to be known as the “Beneficial Ownership Disclosure Rules of 2026”, will consolidate and streamline all existing SEC issuances related to the declaration and submission of beneficial ownership information.

The current framework governing beneficial ownership disclosure (collectively referred to as the “Existing Regulations”) comprises the following issuances, which may be amended or repealed upon the adoption of the Draft Guidelines:

  1. SEC Memorandum Circular No. 15, Series of 2019, as amended by Memorandum Circular No. 10, Series of 2022, which revised the General Information Sheet (GIS) to include beneficial ownership details;
  2. SEC Memorandum Circular No. 30, Series of 2020, which updated the GIS requirements for foreign corporations to reflect beneficial ownership; and
  3. SEC Memorandum Circular No. 1, Series of 2021, also known as the Beneficial Ownership Transparency Guidelines.

The Draft Guidelines propose substantial reforms aimed at enhancing transparency, accountability, and regulatory compliance in corporate ownership structures. These reforms are part of the SEC’s broader efforts to prevent the misuse of corporate vehicles for illicit activities such as money laundering, and to combat financial crimes.

Key Proposed Reforms

Among the notable changes introduced in the Draft Guidelines are the following:

1) Lowered threshold for identifying beneficial owners

The reporting threshold for determining beneficial ownership based on direct or indirect voting rights in a reporting entity will be reduced from 25% to 20%, compared to the Existing Regulations. The SEC may further adjust this threshold in the future to align with evolving international standards and best practices.

Detailed guidance is also provided in the Draft Guidelines on calculating beneficial ownership in “special cases,” such as corporations with tiered or multi-layered ownership structures and cross-border arrangements.

For entities with complex ownership chains, indirect beneficial ownership is determined by multiplying the ownership percentages at each level of the corporate hierarchy, with no restriction on the number of layers considered. A natural person must be identified as a beneficial owner if they exercise effective control at any level, even when their computed ownership interest falls below the 20% threshold.

On the other hand, in cases involving ownership structures that span multiple jurisdictions, corporations are required to make “reasonable efforts” to trace beneficial ownership across all relevant jurisdictions. The SEC may accept certifications from foreign regulatory authorities as supporting evidence.

2) Creation of a Beneficial Ownership Registry

The SEC will establish a Beneficial Ownership Registry for the submission, maintenance, and access of beneficial ownership information. Access to the registry will be subject to data privacy compliance and information access protocols.

Verification of the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of submitted information will be carried out by the SEC through audits and other compliance monitoring measures. To support this process, the SEC may request additional data from foreign jurisdictions and collaborate with relevant government agencies or private entities to validate the disclosed beneficial ownership details.

3) Changes to the reporting timelines

Under the Existing Guidelines, newly registered corporations were required to disclose beneficial ownership information within thirty (30) days from the issuance of their certificate of registration. In contrast, the Draft Guidelines mandate submission of such information at the time of incorporation or registration, with the issuance of a certificate of incorporation or license to do business conditioned upon compliance. Furthermore, any changes in beneficial ownership must be reported within seven (7) calendar days from the date of the change.

4) Substantially increased penalties for directors and officers

When directors or officers of a reporting entity fail to exercise due diligence in ensuring compliance with beneficial ownership disclosure requirements resulting in delayed submission or non-submission, the SEC may impose administrative fines on such directors or officers. Under the Existing Guidelines, these currently range from Php 10,000 to Php 100,000 depending on the nature and frequency of the violation. The Draft Guidelines propose increasing these penalties to Php 50,000 to Php 500,000, reflecting a more stringent approach to enforcement.

In addition to delayed reporting, cases involving false declarations will carry more severe consequences. Under the current framework, responsible directors or officers may be fined up to Php 200,000 and face disqualification from serving as corporate officers or directors for up to five (5) years. The Draft Guidelines raise the maximum fine to Php 1 million while maintaining the disqualification period.

This substantial increase in penalties suggests a stronger regulatory focus on accountability and highlights the expectation that directors and officers actively oversee compliance with disclosure obligations.

5) Encouraging whistleblowers to report violations

The Draft Guidelines encourage whistleblowers to report potential violations of the beneficial ownership disclosure requirements. Information received by the SEC shall be evaluated and, where appropriate, used to initiate formal investigations. Whistleblowers will be protected under the SEC’s whistleblower policy and may be compensated in a manner determined by the SEC.

The inclusion of whistleblower provisions in the Draft Guidelines appears to reflect an effort to enhance existing mechanisms for identifying potential regulatory breaches.

Conclusion

With regulatory reforms on the horizon, corporations are strongly encouraged to proactively evaluate and strengthen their internal controls and compliance systems. Aligning with the updated requirements, maintaining accurate records, and submitting disclosures promptly will be essential to mitigate risks and avoid potential sanctions, not only for the corporations, but also for their directors and officers, once the Draft Guidelines are adopted.

This newsletter is given as general information for reference purposes only and therefore does not constitute our firm’s legal advice. Any opinion stated in this newsletter is a personal view of the author(s) and not our firm’s official view. For any specific matter or legal issue, please do not rely on this newsletter but make sure to consult a legal adviser. We would be delighted to answer your questions, if any.

Download full text(PDF)

Lawyers

Corporate Related Publications

General Corporate Related Publications

Global Practice Related Publications

Asia and Oceania Related Publications

Philippines Related Publications

Apply Select Practice Areas
Apply